Switching from LTL to FTL with Amazon Freight: LTL vs FTL for Growing Shippers

Striking the right balance between less-than-truckload shipping (LTL) and full truckload (FTL) is essential to your transport cost base and day‑to‑day efficiency. However, LTL‑to‑FTL ratios are not static; they shift as your shipment business evolves. The model that served you well at one stage of growth can quietly become expensive if you don’t periodically review how you use each mode.

This section looks at how LTL and FTL differ, and the practical signals that it’s time to rebalance your mix.

LTL freight shipping moves your pallets as part of a shared trailer. Multiple shippers’ loads are consolidated together, which means you only pay for the space you use. LTL typically involves more touchpoints, but offers flexibility and can be a strong fit for smaller, variable flows or thinner lanes where you don’t have a full trailer on a regular basis.

FTL gives you a dedicated trailer for a single shipment, running directly from origin to destination. That suits higher, more predictable volumes on repeat lanes, or time‑sensitive flows where minimising handling and controlling windows is critical.

Both models have a role as your network scales, and Amazon Freight offers LTL and FTL options that you can combine as your UK and EU footprint evolves

As shipment volumes rise and your lane map evolves, the impact of your LTL vs FTL choices becomes more visible.

If you mainly use LTL, you might notice some corridors now ship high pallet counts most days between the same sites. At that stage, you can end up paying shared‑network rates for what has effectively become a full‑truck movement, with extra touchpoints and dwell that your operation no longer needs.

If you are built around FTL, the pattern can run the other way. As you add new, smaller destinations or increase delivery frequency, trailers on some routes may start to run consistently under‑utilised. The headline rate per load can still look competitive, but your cost per pallet quietly rises and tractors spend more time hauling air.

So, how do you know when a lane that’s been working well on LTL should start to be tested as FTL instead? For most UK shippers, the answer lies within a few factors: how many pallets you’re moving, how full those pallets are, and how often you’re running the lane.

At a high level, LTL and FTL price in different ways. LTL is typically charged by pallet, making it attractive for smaller, variable shipments. But you’re effectively paying for consolidation and multi‑stop linehaul.

FTL is priced per dedicated load on a lane. As you add more pallets to that trailer, the cost per pallet tends to fall, because the fixed cost of the truck is spread across more units. Once you are regularly filling a significant share of the trailer, the all‑in cost per pallet on FTL can often undercut the equivalent LTL spend on the same flow, while also reducing touchpoints.

The exact break‑even point depends on the lane, but looking at cost per pallet or kilo by lane, rather than just rate per load, is the first step in spotting lanes where FTL may now be more efficient.

Every network is different, but a few guiding signals can flag lanes where FTL is worth a closer look, including:

• Pallet count: If you are frequently shipping high pallet counts between the same two sites, benchmark the lane as a potential FTL rather than a series of part‑loads.
• Weight and cube utilisation: When loads are close to realistic trailer weight or space limits, a dedicated move often improves cost per kilo and reduces touchpoints.
• Shipment frequency: If you’re sending several LTL shipments a week on the same corridor, test whether consolidating some of that volume into fewer, fuller departures changes your per‑pallet economics.

Cost and volume thresholds are one side of the decision. The other is what you see every day in your operation. Certain patterns in your LTL flows are strong signals that a lane is ready to be tested as FTL instead.

If your LTL movements on a lane are regularly just shy of a full trailer, this is a good moment to benchmark a dedicated FTL option and compare both cost per pallet and handling steps.

Another signal is when service issues on shared, multi‑stop routes start to affect your delivery promises. Issues to be aware of include more variability in arrival times or occasional missed windows. If these are concentrated on a small number of high‑volume lanes, moving those specific flows to direct FTL runs can stabilise transit and cut touchpoints.

New lanes are a chance to design the right model from day one. If you’re opening a regional hub or setting up regular flows into Europe, and you already expect steady pallet volumes, it might be more efficient to plan scheduled FTL trunks from the outset, with LTL reserved for ad‑hoc or ramp‑up shipments.

A simple, repeatable check is often enough to see where FTL deserves a closer look alongside your current LTL setup. The four steps below give you a practical way to compare options lane by lane.

Start by looking at where your LTL spend is concentrated today. Pull a view of your top LTL lanes by total cost and pallet volume over a recent period, then note how often each lane runs. This highlights the repeatable, higher‑volume flows that are most likely to benefit from FTL.

For the lanes that stand out in Step 1, do a quick cost‑per‑pallet comparison. Take an indicative FTL rate for that origin–destination pair, divide it by the typical number of pallets you would load on a dedicated trailer, and compare that figure with the average LTL cost per pallet you are currently paying on the same lane.

This gives you a first view of where FTL is already close to, or below, your effective LTL economics.

steps and more predictable ETAs would make a material difference. A lane that looks broadly cost‑neutral between LTL and FTL may still be a strong FTL candidate if it supports internal SLAs that are hard to maintain in a multi‑stop, shared network.

Finally, use these insights to pick a small set of trial lanes. Good candidates are routes with high, repeatable pallet volume between the same sites, predictable demand patterns, and clear delivery windows at each end. Testing Amazon Freight FTL here will give you the clearest read on potential savings and reliability gains.

Once you’ve identified potential lanes for FTL, the next step is to make the change. This is best done gradually, so you can validate the economics, protect service, and keep flexibility as volumes move.

For most shippers, the first move is to keep LTL where it still fits, and introduce FTL only where the case is strongest. This lets you capture the cost and reliability benefits of dedicated trailers on core routes, without losing the flexibility that shared capacity offers elsewhere.

Amazon Freight makes this simple, supporting both FTL and LTL so you can build a hybrid approach that reflects your own network, then dial volumes up or down by lane as your needs change.

Rather than moving a large number of lanes at once, many shippers start with one or two trial routes. For a set period, those flows are planned as FTL instead of LTL, with everything else left unchanged.

During the trial, you compare a small set of familiar KPIs: cost per pallet, on‑date pickup and delivery performance, and any change in damage or claims. That side‑by‑side view on live lanes gives you a grounded read on how FTL behaves in your operation before you commit to a wider rollout.

Even strong FTL lanes will see volume move up and down. That’s why a practical transition plan includes clear rules for what happens when demand drops below your target fill level, or when patterns shift temporarily. In many cases, that simply means routing specific departures back through LTL until volumes recover, while keeping FTL as the default for the lane.

With Amazon Freight, those adjustments can be made quickly. You can quote and book both FTL and LTL on eligible routes through our portal and monitor how each mode is performing. That flexibility allows you to lock in FTL where it works best, with LTL acting as a built‑in safety valve when conditions change.

Amazon Freight blends advanced technology with Amazon’s network of 9,200+ owned trailers and 10,000+ trusted carrier partners across UK & EU to move both FTL and LTL shipments, simply and reliably. In our self‑service portal you can get live quotes, book shipments and track loads end‑to‑end, with transparent pricing and real‑time ETAs so you can see exactly what each lane is costing and how it’s performing.

That makes it easier to design and keep adjusting a hybrid model. You can use FTL to lock in direct, cost‑efficient routes, while leaning on LTL for lower‑volume destinations and weeks where demand dips. The result is a middle‑mile network that’s more cost-efficient to run and more resilient as volumes shift.

Create your free shipper account today

Take advantage of Amazon Freight’s global freight network, advanced logistics technology, and competitive pricing. Create your free shipper account today to get started.

Create free account